Practitioner Experience Notes (PENs)

Search published Practitioner Experience Notes (PENs). Members can view any PEN; only the author and admins can edit. Authors can choose to display their name or remain anonymous to Members, though public search results will always be made anonymous.

VIP visits: the operational drag nobody budgets for

← Back to PENs
Attribution: SCUK Alumna
PEN Type: Field Experience (Programme Delivery)
Main country: Cambodia
Other countries: Thailand
Project Themes: Operations & Field Leadership, Health – Medical, Communications & Media
Role: Clinic operations
Mission brief: Brief was to help establish a Rehab Centre in Qui Nhan for war-wounded children
Audience: Frontline / Field, Programme / Project, Country or Regional Management
Geographic applicability: Global / broad applicability
Dates: 1978 → 1982
Advice Summary: You don't have to tug your forelock to every proposed VIP visit. The best defence is a published process for controlled access that you can refer requests to.
Key words/phrases: delegations, fact-finding trips, MPs, senators, clinic disruption, visitor control
Operational snapshot
  • Pattern: a constant trail of visiting MPs and senators on ‘fact-finding trips’
  • Impact: dozens in a day; same questions; pulled staff away from clinical work
What it felt like on the ground Some days you were dealing with dozens of visitors, all asking exactly the same questions. Teams (including ours) put strong complaints in writing. It was ‘unregulated visiting from various self-important visitors’ and it ‘seriously impeded work in busy clinics.’ Lessons learned
  • Visitor management needs one controlling function with:
    • limits, time windows, and routes,
    • briefing packs,
    • protected clinical zones and ‘no interruption’ periods.
  • A simple principle works: two visit, and they can debrief the rest.
What I’d tell my younger self Protect the clinic first. You can brief the powerful later — once, properly, without wrecking the day.