Search published Practitioner Experience Notes (PENs). Members can view any PEN; only the author and admins can edit. Authors can choose to display their name or remain anonymous to Members, though public search results will always be made anonymous.
Uncontrolled ‘charities’ in camp: when ‘help’ has strings attached
Attribution: SCUK Alumna
PEN Type: Field Experience (Programme Delivery)
Main country: Cambodia
Other countries: Thailand
Project Themes: Operations & Field Leadership, Safety, Risk & Security, Protection
Role: Field worker
Mission brief: Mitigating the Khmer Rouge in a camp on the Cambodia./Thailand border.
Audience: Frontline / Field, Programme / Project, Country or Regional Management
Geographic applicability: Global / broad applicability
Dates: 1978 → 1982
Advice Summary: Never, ever turn a blind eye. If you kmow something is wrong, do something about it. System work, maybe not 100%, but you can always improve.
Key words/phrases: uncontrolled actors, proselytising, conditional aid, camp access, coordination rules, Haiti 2010
Operational snapshot
- Camp environment: large displaced population; weak control over who enters and operates
- Camp operations need minimum governance: access rules, basic standards, and coordination boundaries.
- ‘Conditional aid’ is not a side issue — it shapes power, behaviour, and harm.
- If enforcement is weak, at least make it visible: who is doing what, where, and under what rules.