Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hey, folks: a deafening silence on this so far! All ideas gratefully received: it’s not too late! Thanks.
Leonie, if you buy me a drink on Wednesday I’ll even forgive you for mis-spelling my name… (After 30 years and six months I’d have thought you’d have got it straight, but – blame the spell-checker?
That nice Mr Clegg will sort it all out for us, won’t he???
Maybe we should set up the CCMA campaign – ‘Campaign to Combat Misfiring Algorithms’… At the end of the day it’s people who write the code, and it’s a question of how much importance organisations like Facebook attach to getting it right. I don’t buy the argument that we are all doomed because computers are taking over the world – but we will be if we don’t insist on proper leadership and high standards. Just sayin’!
Pete, I agree. This really moved me. It strikes the right balance between showing the horror of war and its effects on children, and inspiring the hope that we can do something to alleviate the worst effects.
I couldn’t let Pete Smith be the only one to be talking about himself – to himself… So my update is attached. BTW I only have one Oxford cricketing story, which is that one Saturday I scored a hundred before lunch and then the next day was clean bowled first ball… It was a good lesson in humility!
Whatever-happened-to-Mike-Aaronson-4.pdf
12th August 2018 at 20:08 in reply to: Development post Brexit: Put the ambition, inclusion and development back into Aid #19145There’s another area where the UK can be – some would say already is – a global superpower for development. That’s the area of academic research leading to development impact. In 2015, as part of the last Comprehensive Spending Review, £1.5 bn was taken out of the aid budget over a five year period and used to establish the new Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF). Seen at the time as something of a cynical move (a way of maintaining funding for universities by finding a new way of spending aid money) this was actually a very good idea. It means that the UK research community is incentivised to conduct research that marries traditional academic curiosity with the need to solve real world challenges.
In 2016 I was asked to chair the Strategic Advisory Group for the GCRF and we have produced a set of criteria that we want to see guide the way this fund is utilised. You can see the details here: https://www.ukri.org/files/legacy/international/global-challenges-research-fundsagcriteria-pdf/ You’ll probably recognise a lot of ideas that are familiar to the way we approached our task when we were working in SC UK, and the organisation, with its understanding of the ‘how’ of development, is indeed well placed to be a partner of universities and other research bodies in bidding for GCRF funding. There is at least one example of where this has happened already; details of the GCRF-funded RECAP project (“Research capacity strengthening and knowledge generation to support preparedness and response to humanitarian crises and epidemics”) are here: https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres-projects-groups/recap
Interestingly, in an era where Ministers have to fight hard to defend the aid budget against a range of attacks, research is one area that seems to have a wide range of support. Here’s one example: https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/global-britain-global-solutions-how-british-rd-can-transform-international-development/
All this is good news for a thinking charity such as Save the Children. As Eglantyne Jebb said: “the new charity must be scientific”!
Just checking!

All looks good to me…
-
AuthorPosts